Describe and assess the elements and structure of a successful RM function
ERM roles and responsibilities of the people within an organization
How the different groups
should interact
Recommand a structure for an organization’s RM function
Describe how financial
and other risk
and opportunities
influence the selection of strategy
Discuss the application of the RM control cycle, including the relevance of external influences and emerging risks
Focus is on some high level processes and structures that support effective RM
Look at how the overall strategy of a company may be influenced by risks, and how implementation of RM control cycles can enable it to deal appropriately with such risks
Consider how RM might be organized within a hierarchical role-based structure
The degrees to which risks
are embraced or mitigated forms an important part of the overall corporate strategy
Corporate Strategy
Involves assessing its value chain
, core competencies
and the risk/return economies
of the overall business to decide where in the value chain it ought to compete
Strategy covers a wide range of different corporate decisions
(e.g. sales growth
, product choices
,distribution
, target markets
etc)
Where RM comes into play
Risk organiztion, retention, and transfer can form part of the overall business strategy of the organization even thought they have a transactional context
The degree to which risks are embraced or mitigated can be a key part of the overall strategy above, e.g.:
Problem with taking on too much risk
Companies that takes on and retain more risk can achieve higher return but might find themselves in difficulties more often
Problems in one area can quickly disrupt operations in other areas, reducing future profits further
Company that is in difficulty may take decisions that adversely affect some stakeholders
\(\hookrightarrow\) Can reduce the profitability and value of the company
Cost of financial distress
Encourage management to take actions that conflict with the interest of other stakeholders
, e.g.:
Produce poor quality goods
Operating in unsafe environment
Cut back on long term investment
Exiting promising LoB
Liquidating operations that was adequate
Volatility in earnings can also affect the share price and ability to take advantage of tax credits
Companies that can benefit from active RM
Probability of financial distress can directly affect the value of a company
Companies that benefit most from active RM:
Offer products with high added value (e.g. having high production quality)
Offer products for which there are high costs of switching to another line
Offer products for which the value to customers depends on complementary services or products supplied by other independent companies
Have high sales growth opportunities
Managing uncertainty: Horizon Scanning and Flexibility
Attention is increasingly being paid to the management of uncertainty in the widest sense
Systematic management of corporate uncertainty is becoming more prevalent
Techniques (horizon scanning) to ensure potential problems are spotted early so that appropriate mitigating actions can be taken
Horizon scanning:
Knowledge gathering to try to spot pressures at the earliest opportunity and to give the organization time to adapt
Embedding resilience and flexibility into corporate structures
Help deal with problems that aren’t spotted sufficiently early to facilitate appropriate mitigation
Since adaptation is not always possible, some organizations are looking strategically at structural change so they become more flexible and can better withstand pressures when they arise
Particularly applies to financial robustness and flexibility
Operational flexibility examples:
Increase use of outsourcing
Spread operations over various sites/countries
Shift distribution channels
Move away from grouping individuals into specialist teams and operating more using multi-discipline project teams
Control Cycle:
Will discuss key points about control cycles from a number of different sources
Process and cycles are typically developed to meet an organization’s specific needs (so no single right answer)
Applying the actuarial control cycle to risk management to get the ERM process
The cyclical structure of the process through analysis (+ identification of risk), quantification, management, monitoring, and modification is directly applicable to ERM
All the key components are discussed in details in later modules
Need well defined risk metrics and risk reporting systems to ensure the the monitoring stage is robust
Line management staff in the BU
Accountable for measuring and managing risk in individual BUs
on a daily basis
Should be in line with the company’s stated risk appetite
and risk policies
CRO and risk management team
Centralized RM function and compliance team
Accountable for establishing risk and compliance programs
and policies
Supporting and monitoring the line management
and reporting to the Board
Board and audit function
RM process
, setting RM strategy, approving policies, and ensuring that ERM is effectiveThe Risk Management Function (RMF) doesn’t have to be one department