Describe the tools and techniques for identifying and managing credit and counterparty risk
Sec 1 & 2: Focus on the normal view of credit risk (i.e. risk of a counterparty defaulting on its obligations)
Sec 3: Consider managing a company’s own credit worthiness (i.e. risk that the company defaults on its obligations to others)
Exam note:
5 stages in the credit risk management process:
Policy and infrastructure
Credit granting
Exposure monitoring, management and reporting
Portfolio management
Credit review
Goal of this stage:
To have documented credit policies and procedures
To ensure credit risk can be effectively identified, measured, monitored, controlled and reported
This stage involves:
Establishing an appropriate credit environment
Adopting credit risk policies
and procedures
Appropriate to the company’s business context
Address a range of topics
Adopted by senior management
Implementing credit risk policies
and procedures
Communicate to all relevant employees
Review at least annually to reflect any change in the business context
Developing methodologies and models with appropriate systems
Defining data standards and conventions
Extending credit to customers or other counterparties:
Credit analysis/rating of counterparties
Credit approval
Pricing and setting term and conditions for credit
Documentation
Credit rating can be applied to the transaction
or to the counterparty
Characteristics of an effective and efficient credit rating system:
Strike a balance between effectiveness
(accurate, consistent and timely) and efficiency
(low cost)
May be based on pure judegement or deterministic modeling (or both)
Should respond to changes in circumstances of the counterparty
(e.g. ratings being review regularly)
Ratings should reflect the following factors:
Borrower’s repayment history
Analysis of the borrower’s ability to pay
Reputation
Availability and enforceability of guarantees or collateral
Purpose of this stage:
Prevent undue exposure to an individual counterparty
Ensure appropriate portfolio diversification
Provide early warning of possible adverse credit events
(e.g. monitor indicators such as credit spreads and stock price volatility)
2 types of credit exposure:
Current exposure:
Amount of risk today if all credit transactions
were settled and credit assets
sold
Potential exposure:
Amount that may be at risk in the future
Likely to be a function of time to maturity
and volatility
of the underlying instrument
Exposure may be calculated from the current exposure or using some rule of thumb (important to take consistent approach)
Exposure limits
Avoid concentration of risk in a single counterparties
, connected counterparties
and other groupings
Actual credit exposure should be compared to the limits
4 uses of exposure limits:
Risk control:
Prevent from engaging in overly risky business activities
Allocation of risk bearing capacity:
Limits should reflect management’s assessment of risk/return trade off
Delegation of authority:
Ensure credit decisions are made by those with the appropriate skill and delegated authority
Regulatory compliance:
Regulators maintain close scrutiny of credit risk controls
Best practice credit risk reporting
Relevant and timely
Reliable
Comparable
Material
Should includes
Trends
Risk-adjusted profitability
Large individual exposures
Aggregate exposures
Exceptions
Credit portfolio management function:
Optimize the desired risk/return trade offs by defining a target portfolio
Historically credit risk stayed on the company’s b/s until settlement of the transaction
Strategies and financial vehicles used for portfolio management includes:
Buying or selling assets
Securitizing assets
Hedging risks using derivatives
Transferring risk
Current trend is to disaggregate the business into: origination, portfolio management and servicing
Enables loans to be packaged into various asset-backed securities Introduces market discipline and feedback on underwriting
, pricing
and documentation
as separate business components
However, a lack of controls across these dis-aggregated business components is one of the key reasons for the credit crisis
Role of credit review:
Review a sample of transactions and associated documentation to ensure data is correct
Test that systems are working
Enforce underwriting standards
Check policies and procedures are being followed
Results of the review should be communicated to management
Basic | Standard | Best | |
---|---|---|---|
Credit risk ratings | Common definitions of risk and exposure measurement across the business; Very few risk ratings; Focus on individual transactions |
Better risk rating linking into pricing , reserve and capital requirements ; Credit exposure limits by counterparty , industry , country |
Risk managed at individual transaction and portfolio level |
Modeling | Simple spreadsheet models and credit bureau reports | Internal and 3rd party model consider a variety of indicators | Sophisticated tools (incl. simulation models, scenario analysis and planning, advanced credit scoring , surveillance and migration models) |
Credit risk function | Policy, approval and monitoring | More integration into loan origination ; Performance measured by risk-adjusted profitability of BU |
Centralized active portfolio management aim to optimize portfolio risk/return; Strong credit culture |
The level of sophistication required depends on the risk profile of the company
Even best practice companies can build up dangerous levels of concentration of risk
Underwriting and due diligence:
Facilitate decisions as to the appropriate types of response to a particular credit risk exposure
(i.e. avoidance, acceptance, transfer and or management)
Transfer of credit risk is often achieved by credit insurance
, credit derivatives
and or by the securitization
of assets
Approaches to check creditworthiness
Credit scoring approach (Module 23)
Component analysis technique (Module 19)
3rd party ratings (e.g. Moody’s or Experian)
2 potential outcomes of underwriting
Decision
(e.g. approve or denied)
What terms should be placed on the loan
(e.g. interest rate, requirement to provide collateral)
Due diligence: Refers to the care a reasonable person should take before entering into any agreement or transaction with another party
Should be done when a company enter into a major agreement with a 3rd party
Degree of due diligence varies depending on the type of relationship and value of the transaction
Generally covers a wide range of factors (e.g. public
and internal documents
) including subjective information (e.g. interview
with management and other stakeholders)
Can be expensive and time consuming
Process is very similar to that undertaken by credit-rating agencies when determining a rating
2 potential outcome of due diligence
Avoidance of exposure to the counterparty
Acting to limit exposure
(e.g. through careful payment schedule)
Optional reading of an extensive due diligence checklist: “The Financial Risk Manual - A Systematic Guide to Identifying and Managing Financial Risk” J Holliwell
Credit insurance: One way to mitigate large exposures to particular types of credit risk
Benefits of credit insurance
Protection against some or all bad debts
Cover for some or all debtors
Cover for domestic
or international
trade
Specialist advice based on the experience of the insurer
Cover for expenses incurred
International cover for country risk, debt recovery services and any losses on forward foreign exchange commitments
Ability to secure better terms for financing (help to offset the cost of the insurance)
Cost of the insurance will take into account: Industry sector
, the country risk
, the nature of the goods and services
, the term of trade
and the track record of existing buyers
When settling claims the insurer will ensure:
Goods and services have actually been provided
The debt exists
That credit limits have not been exceeded
Insurance premium has been paid
2 types of instrument that can be used to manage credit risk are Credit Default Swaps (CDS) and Total Rate of Return Swaps (TRORS)
Liquidity of both the TRORS and CDS maybe better than the underlying asset
\(\hookrightarrow\) Advantage of using them as hedging tools (Instead of directly selling the underlying credit risk in the cash markets)
Both TRORS and CDS introduce counterparty risk
Use case:
Lenders who have reached their internal credit limit with a particular client, but wish to maintain their relationship with the client can use CDS
e.g. CDS give Bank X the right to sell a bond, which was issued by Company Y to Bank Z for the face value of the bond should Company Y experience a pre-specified type of credit event
Types of Credit Events
Bankruptcy
(e.g. insolvency, winding-up, appointment of a receiver)
Rating downgrade
Repudiation
When debt issuer simply chooses to cancel all of the o/s interest payments and the capital repayment of the debt
Failure to pay a particular coupon
Cross-default
A cross default clause on a bond means that a credit event on another security of the issuing firm will also be considered a credit even on the referenced bond
CDS Structure
Payment of a fee (single or regular) by the party that is looking to hedge to the party that is selling the protection
Seller of the protection will make a credit default protection payment if a credit default event on the reference asset occurs within the term of the contract
Hedge the default risk but does not explicitly hedge the price risk
Settlement types
Cash settlement:
Amount of the protection payment = original price of the reference asset \(-\) recovery value of the reference asset
Disadvantage:
Recovery process takes time, may invoke uncertain cost for the CDS owner and the ultimate recovery amount is uncertain
Contract needs to clearly state what is the recovery value
If it’s the market value, it is important to specify the time
Physical settlement:
The seller pays the full notional amount and receives the defaulted security
Disadvantage: Will be more costly than cash settlement
Other features of CDS
CDS contract can reference a portfolio of bonds
or a whole bond index
Buyer of CDS may not have any insurable interest (no exposure to the reference entity)
\(\hookrightarrow\) CDS can be used as an alternative to short-selling the reference asset
Total rate of return swaps (total return swaps) can hedge both price and default risk
Total return from one asset (or group of asset) is swapped for the return on another
This creates a hedge for both market (price) risk and credit (default) risk of the reference assets
Investors who cannot short securities maybe be able to hedge a long position by paying the total rate of return in a TRORS
Use case:
Increase diversification:
Swapping one type of exposure for another without physically swapping the underlying assets
Manage specific risk
(e.g. credit risk)
Example:
\(A\) owns a risky bond from \(B\)
\(A\) pay coupons from bond to bank \(C\)
Bank \(C\) pays \(A\) LIBOR + 2%
If \(B\) doesn’t default, \(A\) pay additional payment to \(C\) = increase in the value of the bond from \(B\)
(So \(A\) overall pays the total return received on bond from \(B\) in return for LIBOR +2%)
If \(B\) default, \(C\) will receive from \(A\) a net payment on default based on the face value of bond from \(B\) less recovery
Involves pooling together a group of assets, combined with the issue of one or more tranches of asset backed securities (ABS)
Framework of securitization:
Originator
sells those assets to a special purpose vehicle (SPV)
SPV
raises the funds to purchase the assets by issuing debt securities such as bonds to investors (these are the ABS)
The receivables transferred into the SPV meet the principal and interest liabilities on the debt securities
SPV may grant security over the receivables to secure its obligation to repay principal and interest
In which case, investor in the SPV would be entitled to claim the underlying assets in the event of default
SPV will be structured to be bankruptcy remote in the event of the failure of the borrower (i.e. it is a separately legal entity, usually a company in its own right)
Example
Company X sells the secured assets that will generate the future income stream to the SPV
SPV raises the required funds to purchase them by issuing (asset backed) bonds to investors
Cashflow generated by the secured assets is then paid to the SPV, which in turn uses them to meet the interest and capital payments on the ABS
Converts a bundle of assets into a structured financial instrument which is then negotiable
A way for a company to raise money, that is linked directly to the cashflow receipts that it anticipate receiving in the future
An alternate source of finance to issuing “normal” secured or unsecured bonds
A way of passing the risk in the assets to a 3rd party, removing them from the b/s and reducing capital
A way of effectively selling exposure to what may be an otherwise unmarketable pool of assets
Originally they are homogeneous debt obligations (residential mortgages or trade receivables) subject to relatively simple terms and conditions
Examples of ABS
MBS residential and commercial mortgage backed securities:
Payments are secured or collateralized on the interest and capital payments made under mortgages used to buy property
CCABS credit card receivables:
Based on the payments made by credit card holders to the credit card company
CLO, CBO, CDO Collateralized loan, bond and debt obligations:
Typically collateralized on existing bank loans, bonds and a mixture of both bank loans and bonds respectively
Insurance securitization:
Backed by the receivables arising from an insurance book
Almost any assets that generate a reasonably predictable income stream can in theory be used as the basis of an ABS
Borrowing are normally made in a multi tranche format with credit ratings or credit default protection obtained for at least the major tranches
Tranches are repaid according to the rules laid down in the documentation
Actual returns will depend on the actual timing of repayments
on the underlying assets, any early repayments
and any default losses
and recoveries
Expected returns on each tranche are highly sensitive to the choice of model/parameters used to project these uncertain future cashflows
By working with credit rating agencies to structure the bond tranches in the way that best meets the various risk and return requirements of the different potential investors, it may be possible to reduce the overall cost of borrowing (i.e. raise a greater price in exchange for the transfer of assets to the SPV)
Cashflows from the underlying portfolio might be used to create:
Bond with fixed coupon rate:
Most senior security and its coupons are paid first
Senior debt that might carry AAA rating
Bond whose coupons are paid as long as there is enough left from the senior debt:
Mezzanine tranche, typically BB rating
Claim on the residual cashflows from the original portfolio after the 2 senior classes are paid:
High yield speculative bond, equity claim
Such a tranched structure is called a collateralized debt obligation (CDO) if the underlying assets are bank loans
and or bonds
Key benefit
They combine the credit risks of different instruments into a portfolio which is then divided and repackaged as several new securities with credit risk features different to the underlying instruments
These alternative features may be more attractive to particular investors
\(\hookrightarrow\) Proceeds of the securitization will be higher than if the underlying instruments had been securitized as a single tranche
CLN: A collateralized vehicle consisting of a bond with an embedded CDS
holder of corporate bonds
(protection buyer) to transfer the credit risk on those bonds (reference asset) to other investorsProcess:
Setting up an SPV
Sells the CLNs to investors
Uses the proceeds to buy risk-free government bonds
SPV also sells a credit default swap based on the original corporate bonds to the original bondholder
Investors receive a total return based on the CDS premium income and the yield on the risk-free bond
In return, their capital is at risk and may be required to recompensate the protection buyer in the event of a default on the reference bonds
If the CLNs are in a multi-tranche format then they provide not only a useful way of transferring credit risk but also a mean of repackaging credit risk
CLN vs CDS
Company can manage the level of credit risk to which it exposes its own stakeholders by adjusting:
Capital structure
Mix and volume of business it writes
Entities can manage its own credit risk by raising (or distributing) capital, approach varies by entity types:
Investment banks:
Work backwards from the volumes of business they expect to write and their target credit rating to determine the amount of debt capital they need to hold
Insurance companies:
Follow a similar approach as investment bank but on a less tactical basis
The raising (or distributing) of capital is more likely to result from strategic reviews (e.g. business mix)
Pension funds:
Will link capital decisions (affecting contribution rates, benefit levels and the mix of capital by source) to reviews of investment strategy
They will be made in the light of the strength of the sponsor covenant and any alternative methods of contribution to cash payments that are being used
Company with fixed capital based
Generally speaking, most orgs cannot change their capital base as readily as investment banks
3 ways in which a business whose capital base is fixed can improve its creditworthiness:
Writing less of the same business, hence conserving capital
Changing the mix within each particular class of business, which may have a diversifying effect
(e.g. improve geographic spread)
Changing the mix between the various class of business, again to diversify across classes with low correlations