10.3 Incorporating Expert Opinion about the Development Factors
Intervene in the estimation of Chainladder factors
Intervention in a development factor in a particular row
How many years of data to use in the estimation
Procedure
Step 1. Use ODNB from (10.6) for our incremental claim distribution
Step 2. Choose prior distribution
Prior distributions (e.g. gamma, log-normal, etc) are chosen so that the numerical procedures in software (i.e.g winBUGS) work as well as possible
We just choose if we want a strong or vague prior
Vauge priors (i.e. large variances)
Closer to Bayesian Chainladder
Prediction error will be similar to CL or slightly larger
Strong priors (i.e. small variances)
We think prior means are appropriate
Prediction error will decrease
Examples below for a \(n \times n\) triangle
10.3.1 Reproduce the Chainladder
This is the form if we just want to have just a regular Chainladder
\[\begin{array}. \lambda_{i,j} = \lambda_j & \text{for } &i = 1,2,...,n-+1 ;\\ & &j = 2,3,...,n\\ \end{array}\]
Vague prior distributions for
\[\lambda_j \:\: ; \:\:(j=2,3,...,n)\]
- Use vague prior so \(\lambda_j\) is based on data
10.3.2 Intervention in a development factor in particular rows
Example expert opinion: 2nd development factor (\(\lambda_3\), from col 2 to 3) should be 1.5 for the recent 3 years (i.e. row 8,9,10) while the others being the same
\[\begin{array}. \lambda_{i,j} = \lambda_j & \text{for } &i = 1,2,...,n-+1 ;\\ & &j = 2,4,5,...,n\\ \lambda_{i,3} = \lambda_3 & \text{for } &i = 1,2,..,7 \\ \lambda_{8,3} = \lambda_{9,3} = \lambda_{10,3} \\ \end{array}\]
Prior distribution mean and variance is chosen to reflect the expert opinion
\(\lambda_{8,3}\) has prior distribution with mean 1.5 and variance \(W\)
- \(W\) is selected to reflect the strength of the prior information
\(\lambda_j\) have prior distributions with large variances
10.3.3 Intervention in using L-years average
Example expert opinion: Use 5 years weighted average for LDF selection
We divide the data into 2 parts using the prior distributions:
\[\begin{equation} \begin{array}. \lambda_{i,j} = \lambda_j & \text{for } &i = n-j-3, n-j-2, n-j-1,\\ & &n-j, n-j+1\\ \lambda_{i,j} = \lambda_j^* & \text{for } &i = 1,2,...,n-j-4 \\ \end{array} \tag{10.8} \end{equation}\]Both \(\lambda_j\) and \(\lambda_j^*\) have prior distributions with large variance so they are estimated from the data
The first part of the (10.8) is to adjust for later development years where there are less than 5 rows
- For those columns there is just one development parameters \(\lambda_j\)