5.2 6 Testable Implications
6 Testable Implications
Check residuals against \(c(w,d)\)
- Test for Mack assumption 1 (4.1)?
Stability of \(f(d)\) down the column
- Test for Mack assumption 1 (4.1)?
-
- Test for Mack assumption 1 (4.1)
No particularly high or low diagonals
- Test for Mack assumption 2 (4.2)
5.2.1 Goodness of Fit Measurement
Compare different fit of the models based on adjusted \(SSE\) (actual vs projected excluding 1st column)
Adjusted SSE
\[\begin{equation} \dfrac{SSE}{(n-p)^2} \tag{5.1} \end{equation}\]Akaike Information Criterion
\[\begin{equation} AIC \approx SSE \times e^{2p/n} \tag{5.2} \end{equation}\]Bayesian Information Criterion
\[\begin{equation} BIC \approx SSE \times n^{p/n} \tag{5.3} \end{equation}\]Remark.
\(n =\) # of predicted data points EXCLUDING 1st column
Exclude because when we do reserving we don’t predict anything from the first column
So usually equals number of cells in the triangle excluding first column
\(p =\) # of parameters
\(SSE = \sum (A - E)^2\)
- Here you exclude the first column when calculating the difference
- Venter use the adjusted SSE as the AIC can be too permissive of over parameterization for large data sets
SSE calculation can be done with the table features on TI-30XS
-
Plug in each the actual and projected triangle into L1 and L2 (make sure the cells match)
-
Calculate L3 = (L1 - L2)2
-
Calculate ∑L3