5.1 Definitions and Assumptions
Venter Notations | Definitions | Mack Notations (4.1) |
---|---|---|
\(w\) | AYs | \(i\) |
\(d\) | Dev period; \(d=0\) is age @ end of year 1 | \(k\) |
\(c(w,d)\) | Cumulative losses for AY \(w\) age \(d\) | \(c_{i,k}\) |
\(c(w,\infty)\) | Ultimate losses for AY \(w\) | \(c_{i,I}\) |
\(q(w, d+1)\) | Incremental losses for AY \(w\) age \(d\) to \(d+1\) | |
\(f(d)\) | Col parameters; (LDF - 1); applies to whole col | \(f_k - 1\) |
\(F(d)\) | LDF to ultimate that applies to \(c(w,d)\) | |
\(h(w)\) | Row parameters; applies to whole row |
5.1.1 Mack’s Chainladder Assumptions
Same assumptions as the Mack 1994 but stated in Venter’s terminology
- Venter refers these as assumptions needed for least-squares optimality to be achieved by the typical age-to-age factor method of loss development
Remark.
Here \(f(d)\) is LDF - 1
Expected incremental development is \(\propto\) reported losses
- See also (Prop 4.1) from Mack (1994)
Remark.
Losses not in the same row are independent of each other
- See also (Prop 4.2) from Mack (1994)
Remark.
Variance of incremental losses depends only on:
Cumulative losses reported to date \(c(w,d)\)
Age of the AY \(d\) (Does not vary by AY down the column)
Different \(a_{fun}(\cdots)\) leads to different \(\hat{f}(d)\) estimate
- See also (Prop 4.3) from Mack (1994)
5.1.2 Variance Assumptions (for Chainladder)
Same as shown in Mack 1994 Table 4.1
Weight | Description | Variance \(a_{fun}\big(d,c(w,d)\big)\) | LDF - 1 \(f(d)\) |
---|---|---|---|
1 | Simple Average | \(k(d)c(w,d)^2\) | \(\dfrac{\sum_w 1 \frac{q(w,d+1)}{c(w,d)}}{\sum_w 1}\) |
\(c(w,d)\) | Weighted Average | \(k(d)c(w,d)\) | \(\dfrac{\sum_w c(w,d) \frac{q(w,d+1)}{c(w,d)}}{\sum_w c(w,d)}\) |
\(c(w,d)^2\) | Least Square | \(k(d)\) | \(\dfrac{\sum_w c(w,d)^2 \frac{q(w,d+1)}{c(w,d)}}{\sum_w c(w,d)^2}\) |
\(c(w,\infty) = F(d)c(w,d)\)
\(F(d) = \prod_{s \geq d} (1 + f(s))\)
Recall \(\dfrac{q(w,d+1)}{c(w,d)}\) are the empirical LDF - 1
Definition 5.1 (Chainladder Parameter definition) \[\mathrm{E}[q(w,d+1)] = f(d)c(w,d)\]
\(n = \sum \limits_{i=1}^{m-1} i = \dfrac{m(m-1)}{2}\) = predicted data point?
\(p=m-1\) since we don’t predict the first column
- \(m =\) dimension