16.8 Key Elements of Enterprise Risk Model

  1. Underwriting Risk

  2. Reserving Risk

  3. Asset Risk

  4. Dependencies (Correlation)

16.8.1 Underwriting Risk

  1. Loss frequency & severity distribution

  2. Pricing risk

  3. Parameter risk

    • Estimation risk

    • Projection risk

    • Event risk

    • Systematic risk

  4. Cat model uncertainty

16.8.1.1 Loss Frequency and Severity Distribution

Use statistical methods to:

  • Estimate parameters

  • Test quality of fit

  • Understand uncertainties that remain

Common distributions for insurance loss are available in many papers

16.8.1.2 Pricing Risk

Instability from variations in the premiums as well as losses

  • Misestimation of projected losses as well as competitive market pressures

  • Deficiency may exist for many years for long tailed lines \(\Rightarrow\) Accumulation of reserve deficiency

  • Model should include u/w cycle as it contributes significantly to pricing risk

    • See additional details in ERA 5.2

16.8.1.3 Parameter Risk

Misestimated parameters, imperfect form and risk not modeled (Likely largest risk net of reinsurance (larger than cat exposure))

Estimation Risk
Error in estimations the form and parameters

  • Depends on available data (i.e. more and better data reduces this risk)

Projection Risk
Error on forecast of future value even if we fit the historical data accurately

  • Examples:

    • Freq/Sev trend from the time of the data to the current and future underwriting periods

    • Development of ultimate losses

  • Affected by macro factors (e.g. inflation) and the corresponding dependencies should be reflected in the model

  • Unexpected change in external risk conditions also add to projection risk, e.g.

    • Lower fuel price \(\Rightarrow\) Increased driving

    • Long term shift to more extreme weather

Event Risk:
Causal link between a large unpredictable event and losses to an insurer

Example:

  • Court ruling that favors a large group of policyholders (e.g. class action)

  • Exposure that existed, unknown, for many years comes to light (e.g. asbestos)

  • New cause of loss emerges that was previously regarded as not covered (e.g. environmental, CD)

  • Regulator or court expands coverage by barring important exclusions

  • New entrant into market reduces rates to grab market share

Systematic Risk:

  • Operates simultaneously on a large number of policies

  • Undiversifiable, i.e. do not improve with added volume

  • e.g. macro factors such as inflation

See additional detail in ERA 3.2

16.8.1.4 Catastrophe Modeling Uncertainty

Exposure to natural and man-made cat

  • Likely largest risk after parameter risk, special case of parameter risk

  • Based on proprietary cat models, further source of uncertainty

    • Differences between commercial models and different versions of the same model

    • Considerable amount of uncertainty in the probabilities of various events and the amount of insured damage

    • Additional uncertainty from data quality

      • Mismatches of company data fields and cat model assumptions
  • Can quantified by the use of more than one model for each peril

  • Cat distributions are subject to the same considerations of parameter risk and correlation as other risk distributions

16.8.2 Reserving Risk

Adverse development can be significant for long tailed lines

\(\uparrow\) reserve uncertainty \(\Rightarrow\) \(\uparrow\) capital requirement & \(\uparrow\) time holding the capital

Model needs to capture both process variance and parameter risk

Key aspects of risk modeling process

  • Specifying the reserve runoff model

  • Testing it with quality of fit measures

Unearned premium reserve should be modeled in underwriting risk

16.8.3 Asset Risk

Need to focus on issues of the specific markets that the company operates

Main asset classes: equities, fixed income, real estate

  • Different types of fixed income are important in different regions

  • FX and inflation are closely related to asset modeling as well

Asset Modeling: Probabilistic Reality

  • Modeling scenarios consistent with historical patterns

  • Generate a large variety of scenarios against which to test the insurer’s strategy

  • Scenarios are weighted by probability

  • Scenarios should be reasonable when compared to historical patterns

Asset liability matching

  • Offset between insurance risk and investment risk

  • P&C companies can opt for longer duration assets and not match the liabilities to increase investment return while still maintain reasonable ALM risk

    • Need to consider that P&C liabilities are inflation sensitive as well

    • Or if liabilities are carried at PV marked to current interest rate

Efficient Frontier: \(\sigma\) vs \(\operatorname{E}[Return]\)

  • See how it changes by modifying reinsurance structure or asset mix

  • More details in ERA 2.4

Modeling Considerations

  • Bonds:

    • Model with arbitrage free models

    • Should capture historical features of bond markets

      (high auto-correlations and distribution of yield spreads)

  • Equities:

    • Incorporate correlations with bonds

    • Geometric Brownian motion model with additional volatility is more realistic

      (Allow for more extreme motion or even discontinuities)

  • FX:

    • First model interest rates of the currencies then model the FX rates

    • Changes in actual and anticipated interest rates in two countries lead to changes in the FX rates

    • Interest rate movements across different economies are correlated as well

16.8.4 Dependencies

Important to capture dependencies or else the model will be unrealistically stable

Sources of Dependencies:

  • Simultaneous impact of macro economic conditions on many risks

    A good ESG should capture the dependence between inflation, interest rates, equity values, etc

    • This will impact asset values

    • Inflation will impact underwriting losses, loss reserve development

    • Interest rates may influence the underwriting cycle

  • U/w cycle, loss trends and reserve development can be correlated across LoB and with each other

  • Cat and other event losses can impact across lines

  • Large man made cat (e.g. 9/11) can have impact on both insurance and market risk

  • Difficult to quantify

    • May reference studies of multiple insurers, public insurance industry information and macroeconomic data

    • Still require professional judgement

Modeling Dependencies:

  • Avoid using just the correlation coefficient to describe and oversimplify dependency

  • We are most interested in the tail dependency

    • e.g. High inflation or large cat that impacts multiple LoB that would typically be uncorrelated
  • Use copulas to capture different forms of dependency